LED VS. HPS, HID, MH, FL

Are people who do not understand science purchasing lights from people who do not understand graphs?

This has been proposed to us lets examine this is it a busted myth or is it true?





Lets examine graphs from scientific research which relate growth rate to various colors of light.
NONE AVAILABLE









Lets examine graphs from scientific research which relate photosynthetic related responses to various colors of light. A FEW ARE AVAILABLE









Logically based on this information alone there is no data to show that following the graphs relates to faster growth rate. To test this a side by side test is done. The stand alone tests and side by side tests on Youtube do not look promising at this time for LED.









Last year LED was still putting out less energy than FL per watt. If the spectrum is not directly related to growth then it is the LED which is wasting energy.









Truth is found in side by side scientific comparisons. If you do not see this and make a purchase you are part of the scientific method in that you are being used to grow plants side by side vs. the industry properly testing it for you.









What nm (nanometer) wavelengths you see.







NM that makes a certain fuels in the plant.

They did not test for which light colors make faster cell division.

They did not test for which light colors give you faster growth rates.

The best example is an independent test showing green alone does not work well which is being falsely interpreted that green is not necessary.












Yet no graphs for how fast it grows under different colors.